Position paper †Accreditation Essay

Hello,This assignment is for a subject called Quality Management for health ServicesAssignment 2 Position paper AccreditationWeighting 20%Length 1000 wordsAccreditation programs for health services or facilities atomic number 18 non useful. Discuss this statement with reference to specific accreditation programs. In your solution substantiate your claims with reference to literature.The assignment will be marked victimisation the following criteria1. Style, governance and presentation 10% 2 marks2. Demonstrated understanding of principles and frameworks of accreditation 30% 6 marks3. Description of strengths and/or weaknesses of accreditation programs 30% 6 marks4. Identification of opportunities for improvements in accreditation programs 30% 6 marks. foundation garment Accreditation is a surgical procedure of certifying and approving that the services or products produced by a authorized transcription meet with certain standards in quality. In Australia, one of the organ izations that provide accreditation for hospitals and other health cope organizations is the Australian Council on wellnesscare Standards (ACHS). The briny objective of this organization is to improve the quality of healthcare in Australian hospitals. ACHS is an independent organization that works for non-profit purposes and conducts reviews of the performance, quality assessments, etc, during the accreditation act upon.It was formed in the twelvemonth 1974, and several other organizations such as the Australian Medical Council, the Australian health care Association, and the medical colleges association have approved accreditation by the ACHS. For find the standards in the level of healthcare, a committee formed containing representatives from conglomerate sectors of the nation including the general public, government, hospitals, etc. The Council members vote for the Board of Directors.In the division 1996, the ACHS had launched a unique quality program titled Evaluation an d Quality expediency Program (EQuIP), the main aim of which was to deliver customer-oriented healthcare services to the people. A systematic external peer review process was set in place to closely monitor the program. The ACHS has about an 800-organization subscription and also acts as a consultancy to several other organizations throughout the world (ACHS, 2007).Body Accreditation is a office of issuing trust. Any consumer who requires healthcare services desires those healthcare services to be of good quality and ensuring golosh. It croupe be understood that in healthcare there are certain amount of risks, which can only be reduced to a certain extent. Accreditation is one of the means by which these risks can be reduced and quality care can be tickd.The uncomplainings should secernate means by which these risks can be reduced. Through accreditation, the entire process of providing medical care is well documented, besides being fool proof. This would hold in that a proce ss would be setup that would be based on healthy evidences, ensuring better patient charge. Accreditation is often determined by the healthcare and the accreditation organization in strong technical terms that have to be fulfilled (ACHS, 2007).In the year 2006, the Australian citizens committee that maintained galosh and quality in the healthcare sector felt accreditation standards needed to be improved. They also felt that an independent review process was needed to try the level of adherence to quality standards in healthcare organizations in Australia. The organization felt that accreditation is a process to publicly recognize the achievements and adherence of the healthcare organizations national standards.Accreditation should be made available to all public and hush-hush sector organizations, and at different levels including community-based, private-health setups and tertiary healthcare organizations. The accreditation organization should function independent of the orga nizations that it would be accrediting. This would ensure that the performance and the standards that are present in the organization are given no bias by the accrediting organization (ACHS, 2007).Benefits of the accreditation system Greater involvement of the public and the healthcare organizationsThe clinicians who are creditworthy for providing quality care can be involved.Improves the community confidence levels in the healthcare system transgress risk management in patient care amend compliance with the laws (reduction in medical malpractice cases)Patient safety standards are improvedEducation of the staff members towards developing good practices purvey of professional advice and guidanceStaff education and trainingDeveloping strong mission statements, values and objectives for the organizationThe human resource processes can be military forceively handledCompliance with the standards compel by the regulatory bodiesBetter management of insurance claims and those of third par tiesReduction in the insurance costsBetter handling of the organization and the managementBetter flow of informationBetter decision-making processesCo-ordination can be improvedBuilding a proper valuation systemDeveloping areas in which priority and attention is required (Australian Commission on sentry duty and Quality in Health Care, 2007 & JCAHO, 2007)Disadvantages would also be applicable, including Huge costs of accreditation which is finally passed on to the patientEmphasis on resources such as human, support systems, etc.The standards have to be continually updated, changing the area of concentrationAccreditation would concentrate on improving social structure rather than servicesGreater attention on increasing coaction and partnershipIt may be difficult to streamline the processesAccreditation may non have an effect over the outcomesThere may be massive emphasis on competition present in the market take a mien to subscribe to accreditation by more than one organization (PHF, 1997)In the year 2007, the Australian Commission on base hit and Quality in Health Care gave an alternate model for accreditation of healthcare organizations. Consultation with the stakeholders helped to identify the deficiencies in the current system and to develop a better one. The idea was to obtain this new alternative accreditation system across all the sectors of healthcare in a phased manner.Characteristics of this new accreditation system Implementing certain reformsBringing about certain standards in the Australian healthcare systemThe system was to be highly-developed in association with the stakeholdersImprove the quality standardsImprove the compliance levels with the rules in the healthcare organizationEnsure evidence-based practicesImprove the monitoring system confirm mutual recognitionImprove the participation levelsImprove the assessments levels, methods and surveysObligations to be imposed so that the organization adheres to the standards (Australian Commi ssion on Safety and Quality in Health Care, 2007).Conclusion It can be said that the entire process of accreditation needs to be setup in such a way that emphasis is given only in improving the patient care and satisfaction. All the meaningless process and structures that do not have an effect over improving the patient care should be removed. The accreditation organization should ensure that such a system of accreditation is practically applicable by various types of healthcare organizations. Not much emphasis should be given on costs. Even organizations that are providing cost-effective care and are meeting with conjectural standards should be provided accreditation. Accreditation should also be a voluntary system and not a compulsory one. Different levels of accreditation should also be provided (PHF, 1997).ReferencesAustralian Council for healthcare Standards (2007). About US. Online, on hand(predicate) http//www.achs.org.au/whatwedo/, Accessed 2008, March 17.Australian Coun cil for Healthcare Standards (2007). Mission, vision and values. Online, getable http//www.achs.org.au/missionvisionvalues/, Accessed 2008, March 17.Australian Council for Healthcare Standards (2007). What accreditation means. Online, Available http//www.achs.org.au/whataccredmeans/, Accessed 2008, March 17.Australian Council for Healthcare Standards (2007). ACHS Position Statements. Online, Available http//www.achs.org.au/positionstatements/, Accessed 2008, March 17.Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare (2007). UPDATE Review of National Safety and Quality Accreditation Standards November 2007. Online, Available http//www.safetyandquality.org/internet/safety/publishing.nsf/Content/accreditation, Accessed 2008, March 17.Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare (2007). tipple An Alternatvie Model for Safety and Qualtiy Accreditation.Barnes, A.M. (2001). Healthcare Law Desk Reference. Ali-Aba. http//books.google.co.in/books?id=KS5xke6-DEgC&dq=accr editation+advantages+healthcare&source=gbs_summary_s& frank=0JCAHO (2007). Benefits of Joint Commission Accreditation. Online, Available http//www.jointcommission.org/HTBAC/benefits_accreditation.htm, Accessed 2008, March 17.JCAHO (2007). PSP Fact Sheet. Online, Available http//www.jcipatientsafety.org/fpdf/ICPS/PSP%20Fact%20Sheet%20with%20New%20Logo.doc, Accessed 2008, March 17.Public Health Foundation (1998). Accreditation A Study of Issues and Characteristics relevant to Public Health. Online, Available http//www.phf.org/Reports/Accreditation1/final_report.htm, Accessed 2008, March 17.