Historical King Arthur Essay

superpower Arthur is star of the close comfortably known historical figures of all time. One of the close enkindle meditates environ the subtitles and tales of baron Arthur is whether or non he truly existed. The cope has its roots in the Renaissance time when Arthurs existence was defended as the basis for the Tudor monarchs to trace their ancestry back to business leader Arthur as a way to hold onto their reign. Modern historians suggest that a fairy Arthur may blend existed though he was non the same queen mole rat Arthur in the much loved novels and tales that subscribe to been passed trim from generation to generation.This debate forget continue as in that location has been no logical proof that female monarch Arthur did actually exist (The Camelot Project, 1). At the same time, the influence of business leader Arthur will remain an important part of history as vigorous. nance Arthur has had a signifi jackpott influence on publications, art, music and society as far back as the Middle Ages. The fabrication of Arthur projects him as a great legendary British fagot born to Uther Pendragon and Igraine. Some versions of the legend also include information regarding three half sisters of Arthur.Arthur married Guinalwayse and legend says they had no children together although Arthur did father children. Some versions of the Arthur legend contend that Perlesvaus was fathe scarlet by Arthur and Guinevere but a nonher(prenominal) versions say this is not so (Joe, 1). Further, in confused versions of the legend, Arthurs son had different names. One legend states that Arthur killed his son time another says his son died afterwards being attacked by a loopy boar (Joe, 1). These ancestorial occurrences atomic number 18 unclear and vary across different versions of the legends which is perchance i reason why the existence of a true(a) fairy Arthur is so heavily debated.thither has been no archaeological conclusion that a touchable powerfulness Arthur ever existed. Without absolute proof it is difficult to set off potential facts from the more another(prenominal) legends that surround magnate Arthur (Joe, 1). Perhaps the reason why the legend of index Arthur is so popular is because force Arthur was a lurid light in the face of treachery and darkness (Snell, 1). King Arthur brought peace treaty to his land by defending it from every danger and also expanding his imperium to encompass great amounts of land.Under the command of King Arthur, a assort of knights helped the helpless, battled evil and scoured the land for holy relics. The courageous nature of King Arthur pees him a true hero that many generations of plurality have looked up to. He gave people hope in sorrowful times by being the type of ruler that looked out for the weak and the poor. patronage the fact that King Arthur is so loved and admired, he rest a legend. There is no existing proof that tail assembly provide without a surmise that King Arthur is a true historical figure. Instead, the legend of King Arthur will remain a legend (Snell, 1).The vast amount of lit and other media that focus on King Arthur may cause some people to arrogate that these stories be based in part on fact. However, thither is no evince that any of the facts surrounding the legend of King Arthur are true. Part of the reason why so many people assume that King Arthur is a true historical figure may be based on The History of the Kings of Britain which details the life and rule of the heroic King Arthur (Snell, 1). This historical document provides so many in sagacity details about King Arthur that many find it hard to argue with.However, the reference for this document has never been found so the facts included indoors cannot be proven. Further, some are of the opinion that the author of this document, Geoffrey of Monmouth, wrote the history in order to contrive others view his people in a much positive light (Snell , 1). There are many scholarly facts that helper in disproving the actual existence of King Arthur. These are the facts that en equal to(p) King Arthur to keep his place in history as one of the some noble and intumesce loved kings of all time. parable holds that King Arthur was able to single handedly lead an assault that left nine hundred stillborn and allowed him to reign as king for nearly one hundred years. Legend also holds that King Arthur fought giants and strange beasts and was led by a red dragon (Ogden-Korus, 1). Since none of these figmentological creatures or fantastic feats are possible, it can be assumed that King Arthur is a legend as well. This leads to the coating of many scholars. They wish to uncoer facts that may prove whether on that point rattling was a King Arthur behind all the folklore (Ogden-Korus, 1).So far, they have been disap academic degreeed in proving that King Arthur ever did exist so he frame a legend to this day. In order to find proof of King Arthur, many archeologists have attempted to find concrete evidence that can be directly traced to the legendary king. There is very little evidence in Britain that can be traced back to the time of King Arthur. For example, the unproblematic building as well asl during King Arthurs time was wood, which completely decomposes over time and would not provide any proof of the existence of King Arthur. Further, the field of archeology cannot deal with specifics (Ogden-Korus, 1).Instead, archeologists analyze existing evidence and make educated guesses regarding ancient history. With regards to the place and times of King Arthur, these educated guesses have led to the conclusion that King Arthur is simply a legend. One of the closely common associations with King Arthur is Camelot and the Knights of the Round Table. However, this connection cannot be considered fact. The legend of King Arthur is said to have lived during the sixth atomic number 6 but the creation of Camelot d id not come into existence until the one-twelfth degree Celsius when it became a part of literature (Ogden-Korus, 1).There are other more compelling discoveries that have aid in spreading the opinion that King Arthur did once exist. However, this evidence, while compelling, is not concrete. For example, Tintagel Castle, the alleged birthplace of King Arthur was a thirteenth century gatherification so it could not have existed during the time of King Arthur. However, in 1998, an archeological dig at Tintagel Castle uncovered a sixth century fort underneath the castle (Giger, 1). This evidence alone does not point to the existence of King Arthur.There are many sixth century forts in England and Wales and the discovery of this one does not provide concrete evidence that King Arthur ever existed only that a sixth century fort existed where legend says that King Arthur was born (Giger, 1). This type of evidence is exciting and motivates historians and scholars to continue their sear ch for evidence that King Arthur did exist. However, at this time no concrete evidence has been discovered to prove the King Arthur was anything more than a legend. Despite the fact that there is no expressed proof that King Arthur ever existed, there have been many legends that surround his name.Camelot is the perhaps the most well known myth that surrounds the legend of King Arthur. As previously discussed, Camelot did not come into existence until it was included in literature in the twelfth century (Ogden-Korus, 1). Camelot is the most well known and famous castle associated with King Arthur. Experts agree that Camelot is most likely a fictional place because its assume location is unknown. Camelot, located no where in particular, can be anyplace (Lacy, 67). The myth of Camelot has been allowed to spread because of how much people respect and admire the legend of King Arthur.The various versions of the myths surrounding King Arthur often contradict one another but people are willing to overlook such discrepancies because the writings about King Arthur are so captivating and socialize (Miller, 1). People want to see that such a magnificent someone could really have existed so they get caught up in the myths surrounding King Arthur and begin to believe that he was a real person. some other myth that the legend of King Arthur has influenced is the legend of Lancelot, one of the Knights of the Round Table.Sir Lancelot is considered one of the best and one of the worst knights in the court of King Arthur (Sir Lancelot Online, 1). Lancelot is a creation of literature that emerged at the same time that Camelot did. In this portrayal, Lancelot becomes the most valuable knight of King Arthur. He was chivalrous and brave and realised many important tasks including rescuing Guinevere from Meleagant and once again rescuing her from being burned to demise for committing adultery with him (Sir Lancelot Online, 1).Sir Lancelot helped contribute to the myths sur rounding King Arthur because his heroic deeds make King Arthur look good. Ultimately, Lancelot betrays King Arthur by committing adultery with Guinevere but this too makes King Arthur look good because people pity him for the wrongs committed against him. another(prenominal) important and famous myth surrounding King Arthur that has contributed to the admiration of many is his sword, Excalibur. Excalibur is said to have wizard(prenominal) powers.Part of the reason why the myth of Excalibur makes King Arthur so admired is because some versions of the myth discuss how King Arthur pulled the sword from a stone thus making himself appear incantational and strong. However, other versions of the myth keep Excalibur and the Sword in the Stone separate. The myth that includes King Arthur pulling the sword from the stone provides some with evidence that he was a true king because only a true king would be able to even pull the sword out of the stone. another(prenominal) versions say that Excalibur was a sword the King Arthur obtained through merlin from the wench of the Lake (Ford, 1).The fact that King Arthur used such powerful weapons also provides a compelling reason why so many people believe in the power of King Arthur. These weapons are also part of the reason why King Arthur has survived throughout history as one of the most revered kings of all time. One final aspect of the legend of King Arthur that has enabled him to live throughout history is the myth of Merlin. Merlin is a well known wizard that mentored King Arthur. Merlin had supernatural powers and abilities and is said to have engineered the birth of King Arthur through his magical powers (Briggs, 440).The magical powers that surrounded Merlin were of enormous benefit to King Arthur because they enabled him to accomplish great things. These great things are what has allowed King Arthur to become as legendary as he remains today. King Arthur is a real historical figure in that many people truly beli eve that he actually existed. This belief has been passed down from generation to generation so that the legend of King Arthur has become real to so many people. The fantastic accomplishments that are credited to King Arthur make him a much loved and respected ruler.At the same time, the magic and mystic that surround King Arthur provide a sense of closed book that captivates people into believing the myths. These myths have allowed King Arthur to rise in prestigiousness and remain so popular. However, there is no historical or archeological proof that King Arthur ever existed. If such proof is out there it has yet to be discovered. The fact that the legend of King Arthur is so well known and loved has allowed the myths associated with the legendary king to become valid separate of the King Arthur legend.For example, most people do not realize that Camelot and Lancelot are fictional creations that came into existence some five hundred years after the time of King Arthur. These myt hs have provided King Arthur with a reputation of immenseness that cannot be based on historical fact. At the same time, there is no harm in allowing people to believe that King Arthur was real because in the hearts of many King Arthur was real. There is no definitive data to back this assumption up but this does not reject many people from believing in the existence of King Arthur.In the end, history has not proven that King Arthur truly existed but literature and movies have created a character that is so loved that he has become real and he will remain real as considerable as people continue to be captivated by the legend of the King Arthur and the myths that surround him. Briggs, Katharine Mary. An Encyclopedia of Fairies, Hobgoblins, Brownies, Boogies and Other Supernatural Creatures. New York Pantheon Books, 1976. 440. Ford, David Nash. Excalibur. Brittania. 2000. 17 Feb 2009 .Giger, Remus. In Search of King Arthur. Associated Content. 2007. 17 Feb 2009 . Joe, Jimmy. King Arthur. Timeless Myths. 1999. 17 Feb 2009 . Lacy, Norris J. Camelot. The New Arthurian Encyclopedia. New York Garland, 1991. 67. Miller, Michael D. The True Story. Camelot The True Story. Moffat, CO Rideout Publishing, 2008. Ogden-Korus, Erin. An archaeological Quest for the Real King Arthur.1999. 17 Feb 2009 . Sir Lancelot Online. Sir Lancelot of the Lake. 17 Feb 2009 . Snell, Melissa. The Truth of Arthur. A Legendary King. About. com Medieval History. 1999. 17 Feb 2009 . The Camelot Project. Historical Arthur. King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table. 2001. 17 Feb 2009 .